Truckersworld Forums

Free Registration, "Its Good To Talk"
It is currently Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:30 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Reply from the DfT following Meeting 14th July
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:12 pm
Posts: 7659
Location: Skegness
I have today received a more official reply from the DfT although there were matters discussed that are to be looked into.
I have highlighted points in our favour.

Quote:
Dear Barrie

I promised to write to you confirming the areas we discussed when you came to the Department’s offices on 14th July. We were joined by David Glinos, who heads up the team responsible for drivers’ hours, tachographs, working time for mobile workers and lorry parking.

I explained that the Minister, Mike Penning, had suggested you meet me so that the Department could better understand the concerns being raised by drivers who are using the internet forum facility that truckersworld.co.uk offers. My teams are responsible for many of the Department’s goods vehicle related policies including David’s work, operator licensing, traffic commissioners, access to the international market and stakeholder relations.

You said that you have some 4000 regular correspondents through truckersworld.co.uk and around 70 million hits to date on the website. Truckersworld.co.uk includes practical initiatives such as enabling drivers to report stolen trucks to the police and a forum to survey driver views. You felt that the website gives a voice to UK drivers that could be helpful to Government, and I said I welcomed the opportunity your letter to the Minister had given for us to understand driver issues and I hoped we could have a continuing dialogue.

Our discussion last week focused on three key topics:

Lorry parking. You said that the closure recently of two further lorry parks, together with an increase in truck crime and cost considerations for individual drivers in choosing where to park overnight are of particular concern to drivers. Drivers have indicated through your internet forum that they want to see Government taking a lead in encouraging local authorities in particular to enable provision of suitably secure lorry parks including through, for example, the use of park and ride facilities. David explained that Ministers recognise the issues, that there is a study ongoing to understand the characteristics and usage of parks within a 5 mile radius of the strategic road network and that the Department has been consulting on roadside facilities. Ministers will be considering the Government’s role in lorry parking over the coming months and David will keep you in touch with this in due course. He will also put the study team in touch with you so that you can input to that work.



Driver CPC. You explained the significant concerns drivers are highlighting through truckersworld.co.uk and gave me a copy of the protest currently running on the website. In particular, drivers see no benefit in the driver CPC as it currently stands and feel it risks undermining their professionalism. Common concerns raised include the lack of pass/fail criteria, the flexible approach that would allow a driver to undertake the same course more than once as part of their periodic training, the apparent lack of quality assurance of courses being approved by JAUPT, and the costs of training (and in that respect there were concerns about drivers having to bear the costs but also separate concerns about the fact that course costs vary and cheaper courses may not be of high standard). You also indicated there is a real risk of a driver shortage over the next few years as the requirements come into full effect. I said that this is a known risk which DSA, who have led the implementation of the driver CPC directive, are managing. I said it would be helpful to have specific examples of poor quality training and that I would discuss these issues with DSA initially to ensure that your concerns are taken into account. I look forward to receiving any further specific information you have on this, and will write to you further on driver CPC when I have had an opportunity to talk to DSA in detail about your concerns.

VOSA enforcement procedures. You raised concerns that VOSA roadside enforcement prohibition criteria may have changed recently but perhaps not been effectively communicated to industry. I said I would ask VOSA to consider how they publicise changes to procedures. I have since asked VOSA colleagues to alert you to the published website references as and when changes to the operating instructions are published.

I think we all felt that the meeting had been useful, and I was grateful to you for offering truckersworld.co.uk as an additional avenue for the Department for gathering driver views. You asked me to confirm if I was content for you to share this email with your internet forum members. I am fine with that.

Best regards


I will obviously be replying in full, some good points in that they will be directing the team looking into lorry parking to contact me for our input, so they will now be consulting with drivers.
More will hopefully follow once Ministers look into it further.

The CPC, this is an area of which I do not think they realised the back lash, more talking is required in this area and I will be keeping in contact to ensure our concerns are followed up and looked into.

Good again that VOSA will now inform me of any rules changes and I will on contact ask for any announcements so that I can put them on this forum keeping you up to date.

A 1 1/2 meeting so far more was discussed but hopefully this is the open door on offer and it will be up to me to keep in contact on your behalf.

I will move this into "onto the Case" after a short time

_________________
People who like this sort of thing,
will find this the sort of thing they like.
ImageClick Herefor details


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reply from the DfT following Meeting 14th July
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:25 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 7:24 am
Posts: 1464
Location: LEICESTER
I note that on the Dcpc bit they have so far only responded favourably to the parts that the UK Govt has control over such as the quality of courses

Nice to see they recognise that the cost to the driver is an issue but I bet they will never offer to pay for it - which they could legally do

Dear UK Govt - please introduce a system where the trainer giving out the info on approved courses is checked for accurate delivery of the course contents as there have already been many instances where trainers have told drivers inaccurate 'facts' regarding the EU regs or the RT(WTD)R
As a non-testing clause is written into the EU directive then that is not an option for a remedy to the above



Parking - still no offer from them to build and run Govt truck parking sites.... so I suppose the best to hope for is some sort of massive financial incentives for private owners of such sites

_________________
ROG Image
ON THE SICK
IAM SENIOR OBSERVER (Advanced Driving)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reply from the DfT following Meeting 14th July
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:12 pm
Posts: 7659
Location: Skegness
ROG wrote:
I note that on the Dcpc bit they have so far only responded favourably to the parts that the UK Govt has control over such as the quality of courses

This is at the time all they can comment on, they need to look into it and come back to me

Nice to see they recognise that the cost to the driver is an issue but I bet they will never offer to pay for it - which they could legally do

with Government cut backs there is no chance, but I am at present working on an idea that might help, more once I finalise my proposal

Dear UK Govt - please introduce a system where the trainer giving out the info on approved courses is checked for accurate delivery of the course contents as there have already been many instances where trainers have told drivers inaccurate 'facts' regarding the EU regs or the RT(WTD)R
As a non-testing clause is written into the EU directive then that is not an option for a remedy to the above



Parking - still no offer from them to build and run Govt truck parking sites.... so I suppose the best to hope for is some sort of massive financial incentives for private owners of such sites.

A new Governemnt they need to look inot what the last government were doing in reference to the "Lorry Parking Strategy", they are continuing with the investigating to find the needs and areas.
We must allow some time for them to consider how this New Governemnt will move it forward.



As I have said a lot can be discussed in 1-1/2 hours, the initial contact has been made and I have put forward our concerns it is now a case of continuing to follow it up, by talking in the first instance.

We must also give them a chance ;wink; ;wink;

_________________
People who like this sort of thing,
will find this the sort of thing they like.
ImageClick Herefor details


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reply from the DfT following Meeting 14th July
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:26 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 9:46 pm
Posts: 1462
Location: Great Harwood lancashire
One of the better responses so far, I am not convinced they will do anything about the dcpc as it is a eu directive, good excuse to do nothing.
I felt from reading the bit about lorry parking they were a little patronising,
They were less than straight about vosa and their role in raising money from working drivers. I think they are realising that there is a big driver crisis looming and are not sure how to deal with it. perhaps they could cut back on vosa staff as they have gone far beyond what is reasonable in their checks. but a good result Barrie and well done.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reply from the DfT following Meeting 14th July
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 1:08 pm 
Offline
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 2:37 am
Posts: 5677
Location: Underwood - Newport
Yes, a very good result, as their reply must have taken some time to put together it shows they are taking these issues and TruckersWorld serious, which is a very good starting point for things to come.

;beer'

_________________
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=590858115

http://CargoG.bebo.com/

http://www.bebo.com/el-amar


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reply from the DfT following Meeting 14th July
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:30 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:30 pm
Posts: 7
Dear Barrie

I have just had a long chat with Mick who is one of the security guys at the Orwell Crossing and he told me of how NatWest bank are trying to take part of the lorry park off the owner as they put it to help them repay their lone this is by charging them a £250,000 fee called in at any time and to refinance the whole thing. The Routs land (lorry park) is sitting on industrial land and it’s clear to see what the intention of the bank is. Another lorry park may bite the dust, Natwest of course is 89% owned by the Government. I read somewhere that the business rates on this park has already. Mick tells me that since the lorry park opened the Council, Highways Agency, local developers and now the bank have all tried to jeopardise the site I guess for backhanders and such. Makes me wonder why anybody bothers in this bloody country.
I feel guilty now as just found out the brother and co-owner is suffering with stress and has not worked for 16 months and no sign of recovery and still they carry on.

I only found this park on the Eastcoast truckers show a few weeks ago hope I don’t lose it

Tony


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reply from the DfT following Meeting 14th July
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:12 pm
Posts: 7659
Location: Skegness
pontiac

Just Barrie or Baz or many other names I get called is fine no need for officialdom on here.

I have been in contact with Karl on many an occasion over the battles he has had in keeping Orwell open. The land is on Key Industruial land which is why they have fought him for so long.

Karl puts up a pretty good fight and stands his ground, but I would hope that he knows if ever he needs our help then he only has to ask.

The Truckstop is one of the better ones and also he actually respects the work we do and our needs, so I would battle at the side of him if the need arises.

The last I heard from him is that he had won his way and Orwell was safe.

_________________
People who like this sort of thing,
will find this the sort of thing they like.
ImageClick Herefor details


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reply from the DfT following Meeting 14th July
PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:14 am 
Offline
Platinum Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 10:52 am
Posts: 1241
Location: Stockport
To get this meeting so soon after a change in goverment is an achievement, and by the reply given, you have brought to there attention key points that need resolution ;age; ;age;
However due to the hours I work I last night tuned into BBC Political channel and watched a debate in the house regarding transport.
In 45 mins I watched the only mention of commercial transport was reguarding the A14 around Kettering where the point made in the answer given was there was an above average for the road network of commercial vehicles using that route.
The amount of questions raised that the minister, and his secertaries, quoted would need further investigation was horrendous.
Whilst I personally apprieciate they are new in the job surley time spent in oppersition should have them prepared with answers and solutions to all transport problems they knew they would inherit on gaining power.
I am also counting the days to the changes promised in speed limits they put in writing when you spoke to them as the opposition Baz.
Lacking in confidence or hope, but will judge on substance over the parliment.

_________________
The one with the copper top that keeps on going


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Reply from the DfT following Meeting 14th July
PostPosted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:01 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 4:12 pm
Posts: 7659
Location: Skegness
Phil
I am putting a reply together on their response once I have received a bit of feed back.

Take your point on the speed limits ;wink;
I will mention this in my reply but did not have time at the first meeting as I wanted to concentrate on the 2 big issues, parking and the cpc

We have been given some respect by getting this early meeting which was my intention to ensure we give plenty of time for their planning as they take issues on board.
I will be requesting a further meeting in 3 months to push on and find out what they have done since the first.
I now have their direct e/mail so they wil not get chance to forget us ;wink; ;wink;

Providing they take on the first bit by finding out and lookng into things then we have made a start.

_________________
People who like this sort of thing,
will find this the sort of thing they like.
ImageClick Herefor details


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

 

TruckersWorld
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group